top of page

Painting, Sex, and Politics; or, the Armada Portrait of Elizabeth I

Writer: Reinhold DegenhartReinhold Degenhart

The Tudor monarch wielded an arsenal of tools and stratagems to navigate the perils of female statehood. Her most famous portrait, as iconic as the ruler herself, has captured them in visual form.


Formerly attributed to George Gower, Public Domain


In the field of art history, few works carry the sheer political weight that the Armada Portrait of Queen Elizabeth I does. Painted in 1588, the portrait has long been revered for its complex political implications, functioning not just as a depiction of the queen but also as a potent symbol of England’s rising imperial aspirations. While many interpretations have focused on the portrait’s association with the Spanish Armada’s defeat – a crucial event that strengthened Elizabeth’s reign and showcased England’s naval strength – its significance goes far beyond a straightforward military victory.

 

There are three versions of the portrait. The most authoritative version, on display at Woburn Abbey, showcases the queen in all her regal splendor, embodying the strength and determination which characterized her reign. In contrast, the one at the National Portrait Gallery in London has been trimmed on both sides. The third version, which was previously owned by the Tyrwhitt-Drake family, is now on display at the Queen’s House in Greenwich, London.

 

The portrait’s tumultuous background serves as the most striking reference to the Spanish Armada and is frequently cited as a powerful metaphor for the shifting dynamics of power in the late 16th century (the defeat of the Armada also marked the general decline of Spanish naval dominance). On the painting’s left side, English fireships ominously approach the Spanish fleet, while on the right the vessels are pushed toward the rocky coast by the so-called “Protestant Wind”.


Behind the queen, storm clouds symbolize the uncertainty of the times, yet she gazes confidently toward the sunlight, representing the hope for a brighter future for England. Her hand rests on a globe, pointing decisively to Virginia, asserting England’s growing colonial ambitions following the Armada’s defeat.


The crown reinforces her sovereign authority, while the mermaid seen in the lower right corner adds an intriguing layer of complexity. Often seen as a symbol of Elizabeth’s cleverness in outmaneuvering her adversaries, the mermaid also evokes an ancient literary trope of seduction and peril, suggesting that the queen’s triumph was as much about strategy as it was about allure.

 

However, there are several other crucial political aspects to consider when analyzing the Armada Portrait. A key aspect of this discussion is Elizabeth’s position as a female ruler, a role that was often questioned and hotly debated during her reign. The societal norms of the time were heavily influenced by works such as John Knox’s The First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regiment of Women (1558), in which he argued that it was unnatural for women to rule over men, labeling female authority as unbiblical. In this context, Elizabeth, a highly educated monarch, strategically employed portraits as a means of political propaganda to solidify her power.

 

It is essential to understand that, rather than directly confronting the patriarchal structures of Renaissance society, Elizabeth skillfully navigated them, using her femininity as a means of empowerment. The opulence of her clothing in the portrait is striking; the extravagance of her garments serves to highlight her royal status but also acts as a clear statement of authority. Historical records show that Elizabeth dedicated two hours each day to her elaborate dressing rituals, carefully assembling a wardrobe of around 3,000 pieces. This careful focus on her public image was not simply a matter of vanity; it was a strategic effort to present the “right” image to both subjects and rivals. Notably, her reign also saw the implementation of sumptuary laws, particularly the Proclamation Against Excess of 1577, which forbade the lower and middle classes from wearing extravagant clothing. In doing so, Elizabeth not only upheld the social hierarchy of her era but also ensured that her own status remained unquestioned.

 

In examining details in the portrait, it becomes even more evident that the politics of sex and gender are intricately woven into the artwork’s fabric. The use of pearls, symbolizing sexual propriety during this era, is particularly telling. When paired with the color white (for innocence and purity), these feminine elements reinforced Elizabeth’s identity as the “Virgin Queen”. She fully embraced her role as a political leader and presented herself with a saint-like demeanor that both captivated and commanded respect. Yet Elizabeth’s eternal virginity also served as a potent political instrument. By maintaining her status as a potential bride for powerful suitors, she kept them in a state of suspense and thereby skillfully navigated the treacherous waters of courtship and diplomacy.

 

Contrasting with these feminine symbols, the padding of her garments introduces a masculine element reminiscent of armor, evoking a sense of military strength. This duality is further emphasized by the red and blue ribbons adorning her attire, symbolizing the harmonious coexistence of male and female attributes.


Elizabeth’s averted gaze, directed away from the crown, represents the essence of female virtue during the Renaissance. Direct eye contact was often deemed inappropriate for women of her stature. By not looking directly at the crown, she conveys a sense of strength without veering into tyranny, embodying the delicate balance of power and femininity that defined her reign.

 

Even when looking at these select aspects of the Armada Portrait, it is already clear that the painting is a profound testament to the multifaceted nature of Elizabeth’s reign. The portrait encompasses far more than the historical context of the Spanish Armada. Indeed, it serves as a powerful piece of propaganda, meticulously crafted to solidify her position as a female ruler in a time when such authority was often contested. Through the portrait, Elizabeth I is shown to be more than a monarch: she becomes a complex figure navigating the intricate interplay of gender, power, and politics in a male-dominated world.


 
bottom of page